Go Back   DeeperBlue Forums > Hunting > Fish, Photos and Regulations > Regulations and Conservation

Notices

Regulations and Conservation Discuss Hunting Regulations and Conservation in here

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old June 30th, 2008
KWM KWM is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 127
Rep Power: 74
KWM has a quivering mountain of reputationKWM has a quivering mountain of reputationKWM has a quivering mountain of reputationKWM has a quivering mountain of reputationKWM has a quivering mountain of reputationKWM has a quivering mountain of reputationKWM has a quivering mountain of reputationKWM has a quivering mountain of reputationKWM has a quivering mountain of reputationKWM has a quivering mountain of reputationKWM has a quivering mountain of reputation
Objections needed to proposed ban

Dear all, re proposed banning of the use of projectiles.
There has been a great effort so far from people here on Deeper Blue but can I ask that everyone ( if you have not already done so) to submit an objection to

Tech.Conservation@defra.gsi.gov.uk.

Please copy in and objections to

britishspearfishingassociation@googlemail.com

(if you have already sent in an objection can you forward a copy or just an email to say that one has gone in. I am going to ask surfnspear to monitor the numbers with me.

So that I can let people know how many objections have gone in.

Please state clearly that you object or else it may not be counted.

You don’t have to say much but it helps if you state why.
For instance you may which to say that spearfishing does no harm to the marine environment, does not produce any by catch , and is sustainable.

We need to get as many in by the 25th July.

People are already writing to MEPs and MPs and I have been in contact with the fisheries committee at the European parliament.

I am also in contact with a number of other spearfishing federations in Europe who will also be affected by the Ban. That said we still need to fight our own corner, or you never know the UK might go it alone with a ban.

Thanks for all your help Kev.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old July 2nd, 2008
Mr. X's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Great Britain
Posts: 2,891
Rep Power: 590
Mr. X moved beyondMr. X moved beyondMr. X moved beyondMr. X moved beyondMr. X moved beyondMr. X moved beyondMr. X moved beyondMr. X moved beyondMr. X moved beyondMr. X moved beyondMr. X moved beyond
Thumbs up Re: Objections needed to proposed ban

Quote:
Originally Posted by KWM View Post
...You don’t have to say much but it helps if you state why.
For instance you may which to say that spearfishing does no harm to the marine environment, does not produce any by catch , and is sustainable.
...
Highly selective, for species and size; low volume; negligible impact. Low participation. Requires a relatively high level of skill and physical activity (while our country struggles against increasing obesity), and favourable weather and water conditions. Relatively low cost of participation means participation is across socio-economic and age groups. Enables and encourages a healthy diet, low in fat but rich in Omega-3 fatty acids - good for the heart, health and brain. Encourages a greater knowledge and appreciation of the marine environment and coastal areas. As British as Mum and apple pie?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old July 2nd, 2008
Supporter
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sligo north west ireland
Posts: 1,204
Rep Power: 235
fcallagy moved beyondfcallagy moved beyondfcallagy moved beyondfcallagy moved beyondfcallagy moved beyondfcallagy moved beyondfcallagy moved beyondfcallagy moved beyondfcallagy moved beyondfcallagy moved beyondfcallagy moved beyond
Re: Objections needed to proposed ban

We are having a simlar discussion on Ireland spearing and writing to MEPs in Ireland should we keep seperate or try to show that its not just UK but also Ireland preparing to kick up about it?
http://forums.deeperblue.net/uk-irel...2008-a-31.html
__________________
Regards Feargus
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old July 2nd, 2008
ILDiver's Avatar
Smart Aleck? ME!? Nooo...
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 910
Blog Entries: 8
Rep Power: 224
ILDiver moved beyondILDiver moved beyondILDiver moved beyondILDiver moved beyondILDiver moved beyondILDiver moved beyondILDiver moved beyondILDiver moved beyondILDiver moved beyondILDiver moved beyondILDiver moved beyond
Re: Objections needed to proposed ban

Wow, I feel for you guys on this situation. Good luck guys!
__________________
--Chris
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old July 6th, 2008
Mr. X's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Great Britain
Posts: 2,891
Rep Power: 590
Mr. X moved beyondMr. X moved beyondMr. X moved beyondMr. X moved beyondMr. X moved beyondMr. X moved beyondMr. X moved beyondMr. X moved beyondMr. X moved beyondMr. X moved beyondMr. X moved beyond
Thumbs up Re: Objections needed to proposed ban

Quote:
Originally Posted by ILDiver View Post
Wow, I feel for you guys on this situation. Good luck guys!
Thanks Chris. A Romanian-American friend often used to say about bureaucratic cock-ups and red tape of this sort, in his deep, dark, voice, "It is Communism". He had first hand experience. (He should have been in the movies, great voice/presence -- think Béla Lugosi/Boris Karloff).
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:01.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
ISSN 1469-865X | Copyright 1996 - 2008 deeperblue.net limited.
Ad Management by RedTyger